Skip to content

Conversation

gilescope
Copy link
Contributor

No need to check the assert all the time.

(Checked the TODO and it's not time to get rid of it yet)

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 16, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with r? rust-lang/libs-api @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to request review from a libs-api team reviewer. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @thomcc

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 16, 2022
@gilescope
Copy link
Contributor Author

(I did this a while ago but then managed to undo it when I did some other optimisations to the function)

@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Apr 16, 2022

I'd be surprised if it matters much but seems fine to me.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 16, 2022

📌 Commit bf02d1e has been approved by thomcc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 16, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2022
to_digit tweak

No need to check the assert all the time.

(Checked the TODO and it's not time to get rid of it yet)
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2022
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#95346 (Stablize `const_extern_fn` for "Rust" and "C")
 - rust-lang#95933 (htmldocck: Compare HTML tree instead of plain text html)
 - rust-lang#96105 (Make the debug output for `TargetSelection` less verbose)
 - rust-lang#96112 (Strict provenance lint diagnostics improvements)
 - rust-lang#96119 (update Miri)
 - rust-lang#96124 (to_digit tweak)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b47265e into rust-lang:master Apr 17, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone Apr 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants